-
Rebuttal to Hubner’s Response to DeYoung
-
Hubner’s Recommended Reading
My friend Jamin Hubner has posted a list of books (from “both sides”) regarding, in his terms, “Economics and Christian Zionism.” Feel free to check out the list. He makes one remark that I’ll address and let the rest pass: “they will at least pause when Tur and Hays’ [sic] essentially point a finger and…
-
A Trivium of Responses to Jamin
Let’s tackle Jamin’s recent post in three parts, which we will style rhetoric, grammar, and logic. Those familiar with classical education will catch the allusion. The labels don’t perfectly fit, but we’ll shoe-horn the arguments into those labels. We’ll also take them out of the traditional order, addressing Jamin’s rhetoric first (but immediately I will…
-
Maybe Hubner Needs to Look Up "Shill" in a Dictionary
-
Hubner Compares Self to O. Palmer Robertson
Evidently, Jamin Hubner and O. Palmer Robertson share a similar view regarding Israel on some points. Hubner seems to think that consistency demands that if he (Hubner) is a “dupe for the jihadists” and is “supporting Arabs with unsound arguments,” then the same must be true of Robertson. There’s a fundamental flaw in Hubner’s reasoning. …
-
Responding to Ryrie regarding John Edwards and Dispensations
Someone wrote in to Jamin Hubner the following question: In Ryrie’s book he mentions the dispensational scheme that Jonathan Edwards [sic] (not that Edwards was necessarily a dispensationalist) put forth in his work “A Compleat History or Survey of All the Dispensations”. Would this not pre-date Darby? As I have not read this work by…
-
TurretinFan’s Criticism "May Be True" Per Hubner
Jamin Hubner has posted a response to my post that criticized his unsound argument. His post is something of a goulash of various points, from which I’ve extracted the parts seemingly related to my post. He writes: The last few posts on this blog have generated a flurry of responses. But unfortunately, very little is…
-
Supporting the Arabs with Unsound Arguments
Suppose someone argues this: The first is McMahon-Hussein Correspondence, which promised that the Arabs would have their own state in Palestine. This promise was given in hopes of gaining Arab support for the British war efforts against Turkey. The British High Commissioner Sir Henry McMahon promised the following to the Arabs (Oct 24, 1915) in…
-
Reviewing a Blog Exchange Between Hays and Hubner
-
Genesis and Theistic Evolution