-
Further Roundup of Kurschner Responses
The present author recently responded to Alan Kurschner’s “8 Reasons.” (link to the present author’s rebuttal and the original article) Assuming, however, that there might be other responses, the present author went looking and found: One other commenter suggests that Kurschner is unfairly lumping majority text advocates in with KJVO “kooks” (the commenter’s word, not…
-
Centuri0n on Kurschner – Some Comments
Brother Centuri0n has posted a brief article (link) commending Kurschner’s eight reasons (link), which the present author had previously addressed (link). I’m not sure whether Centuri0n actually read the article (he mistakenly claims that AK lists 10 reasons), and Centuri0n’s post may be taken as representing support of the anti-KJV position more than anything else.…
-
Question for Kurschner Regarding
“If You Understand One Thing About The “King James Only” Phenomenon it is Imperative to Know This … The textual end justifies the textual means. They are motivated only in defending a modern printed text and any questions of methodology are irrelevant because they are governed by their a priori that the Textus Receptus (the…
-
Response to Kurschner’s "8 Reasons"
Brother Alan Kurschner has posted an article entitled, “8 Reasons Why It Is Fallacious for KJVO Advocates to Invoke the Majority Rule” (link) Turretinfan Responds: As a preliminary matter it is important to note that the present author is not a KJVO advocate, but rather a KJV-preferred advocate. With that caveat, the present author commends…
-
Response to Kurschner on Revelation 5:9-10
Response to Mr. Alan Kurschner On Revelation 5:9-10 The Present Author Slightly Favoring The Reading of the Authorized Version Introduction In a recent article (link), Mr. Kurschner argued that the Authorized Version (aka the KJV) has several incorrect readings at Revelation 5:9-10. I respectfully disagree with Mr. Kurschner, and I believe that the Authorized Version…
-
Torching of the Text?
Torching of the Text? A dubious argument in favor of the received text commented upon, with several objections thereto readily discarded. Mr. Kurschner recently wrote a follow-up article (link is here) to an early article he had written (my response to that article is linked here) against the King James Version Only crowd. This presnt…
-
Dean John William Burgon vs. Alan Kurschner
Where are the Manuscripts? In a recent article, Mr. Kurschner challenged Dean Burgon’s view of the manuscript ancestry of the so-called Byzantine text. Mr. Kurschner’s article appears simply to adopt modern methodologies and claims of the mainstream textual critical movement, and does not significantly interact with Dean Burgon’s position. Mr. Kurschner justifies this lack of…