-
Peter Enns and the Historical Adam
Peter Enns’ latest post suggests that he has identified the biggest theological objection to rejection of the historical Adam, the first man, specially created by God. Enns thinks that the biggest problem is the wrath of God. Adam’s sin in the garden is important to explain why God’s wrath is against the human race. Obviously,…
-
Finally, I can Agree with Peter Enns about Something
“You and I Have a Different God, I think,” is the title of Enns’ post, and he goes on to state that “I think we have a different God.” In that much, I think he’s right. He claims: And the Gospel certainly does not teach me that God is up there, at a distance, guiding the production of…
-
Ken Ham Refuses to Compromise …
… and suffers the consequences for standing up for his convictions (link to story). Hats off to Ken Ham for opposing Peter Enns and Enns’ agenda. You can visit the Answers in Genesis website for more information. Specifically, here is the post that got Ken Ham in trouble (link to post). -TurretinFan To God be…
-
Albert Mohler on Inerrancy
I see that Albert Mohler has provided an article updating the battle over innerancy, and mentioning the work of Peter Enns and Kenton Sparks, who stand opposed to the Biblical and historical doctrine of innerancy. (link to article) It’s an interesting article to read. The one thing I don’t like is that one might get…