Category: Textual Criticism

  • Chris Pinto vs. James White – Debate Summarized

    The Chris Pinto vs. James White debate on whether Codex Sinaiticus is a modern forgery can be boiled down to a few considerations. 1) Constantine Simonides claimed that he wrote the document based on collating pre-existing manuscripts, and that his uncle corrected the document. Both sides agree that he so claimed. Dr. White demonstrated that…

  • The Age of the World, a Quick Historical Note

    The British Cyclopaedia (1838), Volume 3, Literature, Geography, and History, in the epoch entry, includes the following among other things: The Creation has been adopted as an epoch by Christian and Jewish writers, and would have been found very convenient, by doing away with the difficulty and ambiguity of counting before and after any particular…

  • Textual "Corruption" of the Quran

    A very impressive presentation on the corruption of Quran may be found at this link (link to beginning of relevant section). This was much more detailed than any similar presentation I had seen before. The following is a brief outline: 1. Preservation of the Bible [I will omit these points, which were things I already…

  • The Story of Codex 61 aka Codex Montfortianus

    The following is taken from “The Story of the Manuscripts,” by George Edmonds Merrill (link to book). Codex 61, or Montfortianus, derives its name from one of its former possessors, Rev. Thomas Montfort, D. D., of Cambridge. It is now at Trinity College, Dublin. This manuscript is of special interest among the cursives from the…

  • Textual Critical Resource – Old Testament Variants

    De Rossi’s remarkable Variae Lectiones Veteris Testamenti (various reading of the Old Testament) is now available in full on Google Books including both the original four volumes (1784-88) and the Supplement (1798): Volume 1: Prologue, Index of Manuscripts, Genesis, Exodus, and LeviticusVolume 2: Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, 1st Book of Samuel/KingsVolume 3: Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel,…

  • Jerome Regarding the Septuagint

    I recently happened to stumble across this interesting translation of Jerome’s Prologue to Chronicles (link). Jerome makes a number of interesting comments about the Septuagint: 1) Jerome begins by noting that the Septuagint is not a pure translation: If the version of the Seventy translators is pure and has remained as it was rendered by…

  • Tenacity of the Text – a Response

    Introduction The issue of the tenacity of the text is one of the important points that was raised by Dr. White in his debate with Dr. Ehrman recently (the debate can be obtained here). One of the illustrations of the tenacity of the text is the illustration of a jigsaw puzzle set that includes 1,010…

  • Response to Ehrman (part I): God Has Preserved His Word

    Introduction: In listening to the debate, I think Ehrman provided a very good summary of his position in what he called (in his opening statement), a “very quick conclusion.” Ehrman stated: Do we have a reliable text of the New Testament? Are there places where the Bible misquotes Jesus? The short answer is, there is…

  • Textual Variant in 1611 KJV

    The KJV, 1611 edition, was printed on more than one printing press. While the text printed was generally the same, there was at least one variant. At Ruth 3:15 the text correctly reads (in the current 2/3 majority of extant copies) “she went into the city” instead of “he went into the city”, but the…

  • Dr. White Explains Textual Transmission to Kent Hovind

    Dr. White has provided a series of three video responses to some rather uninformed comments by Kent Hovind on Bible versions. Hovind’s comments appear to be gleaned from the book he recommends, a book by Gail Riplinger, one of the prominent promoters of KJV-Onlyism. The problems in Hovind’s presentation are numerous, and even Dr. White’s…