Pyatcast

Category: Trey Austin

  • Grinding the Grain: Responding to the Substance of Trey Austin’s Arguments

    Having disposed of the chaff in an earlier post (link), we may now turn to the grain portion of Trey’s recent post responding to questions I had posed as to the view of my theological opponents (or are they?) regarding the atonement. I was a little disappointed to see that Trey decided to answer only…

  • Chaff Removal

    Trey Austin begins his latest post with more personal antipathies – not against Dr. White, this time – but against this present anonymous author. Trey writes: “It has taken me a while to post this, primarily because i [sic] have decided not to pursue further interaction with TurretinFan.” The fact that this purported resolution of…

  • Further Response from Trey

    Trey has (I think) clarified that he does not want to come down on the matter of the Atonement one way or another. “There are lots of folks who don’t want to come down on the matter one way or another. R. L. Dabney was one of those. David Ponter is also one. But like…

  • More of Trey Austin

    Well, it seems that Mr. Austin does not like the correction he has received by those he considers his Christian brethren, so much that he has fired off a massive, multi-post response. I have addressed his multiple posts as a group. 1. Opening PostIn which Trey uses a colorful analogy involving dung, while falsely claiming,…

  • Not the Reformed View?

    In a recent quarrelsome and ad hominem post, Rev. “Trey” Austin, III has the gumption to suggest (with the title of the post) that Dr. White’s view in a recent radio debate with Steve Gregg is “not the Reformed view.” Nothing could be further from the truth. After receiving well-deserved chiding from Dr. White in…