-
An Excellent, Substantial yet Interesting Apologetic
Obviously, the writer of this post (link) is much more interesting to read than I am, and he still puts on an excellent Apologetic performance. Good reading, good theology, and good riddance to the fallacies disposed of in the post. -Turretinfan P.S. I’d particularly recommend this for anyone who just suffered through reading Hoffer’s style-focused…
-
Style over Substance? Really?
Paul Hoffer has written – and his accomplice Dave Armstrong has posted – a 22,000 word document, that addresses Dr. James White’s alleged practice of: “By using Plurium Interrogationum in debate, he promotes style over substance.” (source) This is classic pot calling the kettle black. Hoffer provides a 22,000 word article criticizing stlye, and then…
-
A Quick Response to Godismyjudge
Godismyjudge wrote (to someone else): You speak of ability and possibility in a divided sense. That is, given X man is able to do A, but if you consider all factors (including Y), man is unable to do A. When I say man is able to do either A or B, I am speaking in…
-
Should the "Real" Turretin Interest You
Here’s the beginning (two topics so far) of a reading outline of Turretin’s Institutes: http://www.lgmarshall.org/Reformed/turretin_table.html UPDATE: And here’s the way to find his Latin originals on Google: http://johannesweslianus.blogspot.com/2007/11/turretins-institutio-in-latin-on-google.html -Turretinfan To God be the Glory!
-
Should the "Real" Turretin Interest You
Here’s the beginning (two topics so far) of a reading outline of Turretin’s Institutes: http://www.lgmarshall.org/Reformed/turretin_table.html UPDATE: And here’s the way to find his Latin originals on Google: http://johannesweslianus.blogspot.com/2007/11/turretins-institutio-in-latin-on-google.html -Turretinfan To God be the Glory!
-
Owen on the Atonement
Here’s an excellent synopsized article based on Owen’s writing, on the timely subject of the Atonement. (link). -Turretinfan To God be the Glory!
-
Notice to People Who Make Statements
If you make a public statement, it is possible that someone who likes commenting on those statements will provide a “line-by-line” response to your comments. That’s something that usually is going to be considered a “fair use” or “fair dealing” (depending where you are from) of your original statement. If this topic interests you, you…
-
Amalgamated Comments on Comments/Rebuttals in the Atonement Debate
Sorry that this format is so banal. I will try to fix it, in time. Most recently updated December 27, 2007, to add headings and remove a few of the less salient comments. There are just an enormous volume of comments and answers. Response to Comments from Tony (YnottonY, hereafter (“Y”)) Y: I thought I…
-
Note to Folks Following the Atonement Debate
I’ve prepared responses to the comments submitted on the Atonement debate through yesterday. I’m planning that later today I’ll tidy those up and present them, together with any necessary further comments regarding SDM’s “rebuttal to rebuttal,” and/or any further comments that I see on Contend Earnestly in the meantime. After that, I’m pretty much going…
-
God a Narcissist? No, for God truly is Worthy of All Praise.
Ben Wirthington recently published a post suggesting that the traditional Reformed view of God would tend to make God a Narcissist (link). I’ll line-by-line it:BW: “I was recently reading through the proofs of a new book on New Testament Theology, and it was stated that the most basic theme or thesis of NT theology is…