-
Manuscript evidence of Revelation 16:5
The current ECM website data for Revelation 16:5 provides transcription data for around 100 witnesses to Revelation 16:5. Some of those are witnesses are “corrector” witnesses. A comparison of the transcription reveals both a general harmony with the ECM/NA28 as well as numerous departures from the ECM/NA28. Most of the departures seem to be minor. …
-
Versional Evidence at Revelation 16:5
Sahidic (source) Boharic (source) Syriac (source) ܘܫܡܥܬ ܠܡܠܐܟܐ ܕܡܝܐ ܕܐܡܪ ܙܕܝܩ ܐܢܬ ܗܘ ܕܐܝܬܘܗܝ ܘܐܝܬܘܗܝ ܗܘܐ ܘܚܤܝܐ ܕܗܠܝܢ ܕܢܬ ܀ (“Peshitta”) (Eth) And I heard the angel of the waters saying, Righteous art Thou, who art, And who wast, and just; Because thou hast judged these. (Murd) And I heard the angel of the waters…
-
Planned Topics for Debate with Nick Sayers
The following are the KJV Errors that I plan to address in my debate with Nick Sayers. 1. Printing Errors in the 1611 Matthew 26:34 Iesus said vnto him, Uerily I say vnto thee, that this might before the cocke crow, thou shalt denie me thrise. The word “might” should be “night” as later editions…
-
Textual Variant Consideration – Romans 9:1-13
The most surprising differences between the KJV and ESV in Romans 9:1-13 are two places where the ESV is actually longer than the KJV reading: “and cut off” in Romans 9:3 and “next year” in Romans 9:9. While there is a slight difference between the NA28 (link) reading and the TR reading at Romans 9:3,…